“When you develop a urinary tract infection, you’re at increased risk of developing a recurrent urinary tract infection for the next few months, and that has to do with the inflammation in the tissue around the urethra and the bladder,” Tulikangas said. With recurrent UTIs women “go through more and more suffering.”
Women who have two UTIs within six months or three or more within a year are said to have recurrent UTIs, which “pose a significant healthcare burden with $6 billion spend on complicated UTIs in 2011,” according to a paper published in June in Urology. The high cost comes from the need to be hospitalized, because UTIs can lead to kidney infections and sepsis.
“The most serious complication you get from a urinary tract infection is that the infection would spread into your body,” Tulikangas said.
‘This is basic menopause care’
As medical director of the Menopause Society, Faubion has long hoped that internal medicine and family practice physicians would start prescribing vaginal estrogen to their patients.
“I’ve been preaching this for years, as have many of my colleagues,” she said. “Menopause management belongs in the hands of internal medicine, family medicine, because they’re the ones that take care of these women every day. They should be familiar with basic menopause care, and this is basic menopause care.”
While gynecologists feel most comfortable prescribing menopause hormone therapy, Faubion said internal medicine and family practice doctors are “hopefully getting there.” Still, more work needs to be done.
“There’s a lack of awareness in general about the treatment options that are available for menopause, let alone treatment of genitourinary syndrome of menopause,” she added.
More widespread vaginal estrogen use could also bolster older women’s health. The study in Urology found that prescribing vaginal estrogen for women with recurrent UTIs lowered their rates of sepsis, hospitalization, and death for the next eight years.
“It’s been medically proven to decrease the risk of recurrent UTIs significantly from a relative risk of 6% down to a relative risk of less than 2%,” Katz said.
Until 2025, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had a black-box warning on vaginal estrogen, which cautioned of an increased risk of heart disease, breast cancer, and dementia. This frightened many women away from using it. But it’s prescribed at such a low dose that it contributes to fewer complications.
“There’s not an associated increased risk of breast cancer or heart disease,” Faubion said. “There may be a slight increased risk of blood clots associated with it. So there are some side effects.”
Lack of awareness
Vaginal estrogen is underused. A 2025 study in JAMA Network Open noted that only 9% of female Medicare recipients with GSM and a prescription for vaginal estrogen filled their prescription. But even women who fill their prescriptions struggle to use it.
“Not many women are continuing these medications at the end of a year,” Faubion said. “There seems to be barriers in terms of longer use.”
Unlike menopause hormone therapy, which is widely prescribed, vaginal estrogen suffers from public relations problem, with few women knowing what it is.
“Lack of awareness is a problem but also lack of awareness that there’s a separate product,” Faubion said. “Vaginal forms of estrogen are actually more effective in managing GSM symptoms than systemic estrogen is.”
As for Karen, she’s been using her vaginal estrogen consistently, applied internally and externally, twice weekly for five years. She often tells other women about it because it’s made such a huge difference for her.
“I tell anyone who will listen to me about its benefits,” she said. “It changed so much—UTIs, sex. Instead of feeling like, ‘Oh this is just a result of getting older,’ it made me realize that women don’t have to live in pain.”