Our weekly wrap-up of antimicrobial stewardship & antimicrobial resistance scans
Urinary culture intervention linked to lower antibiotic prescribing
An intervention to reduce antibiotic treatment for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) at a Toronto hospital was safe and associated with reduced exposure to unnecessary antibiotics, Canadian researchers reported this week in Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology.
In a prospective observational study conducted at Mount Sinai Hospital in Toronto, which implemented an intervention in 2013 to stop processing midstream urine cultures (MSUs) from patients unless the laboratory was called, researchers interviewed 1,678 patients with an MSU order on days 0 and 4 to ask about urinary symptoms and any adverse events. From 2017 to 2019, day 30 follow-up was added.
The primary outcome was serious adverse events due to not processing MSUs. Secondary outcomes included nonserious adverse events, rates of cultures submitted and processed, proportion of patients prescribed urinary tract infection (UTI)-directed antibiotics, and laboratory workload.
Among 912 and 459 patients followed to days 4 and 30, respectively, no serious adverse events attributable to not processing MSU cultures were identified. However, 6 patients (0.7%) had prolonged urinary symptoms potentially associated with not processing MSU cultures.
The researchers estimated that 4 patients missed having empiric antibiotics stopped in response to negative MSU cultures, and 99 antibiotic courses for asymptomatic bacteriuria (ASB) and 8 antibiotic-associated adverse events were avoided. The rate of submitted MSU samples and proportion of patients receiving empiric UTI-directed antibiotics did not change. The proportion of MSU cultures processed declined from 59% to 49% (P < .0001), and total laboratory workload was reduced by 185 hours.
"In conclusion, not processing MSU cultures from medical and surgical inpatients is safe, and it reduces inappropriate ASB therapy and laboratory workload," the authors of the study wrote. "We believe that the benefits of reduced antibiotic use outweigh the harm of persistent symptoms in a very few patients."
Sep 2 Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol abstract
Antibiotic prescribing frequent in ill Kenyan children, study finds
US and Kenyan researchers reported yesterday in Clinical Infectious Diseases that antibiotic treatment was high in a cohort of Kenyan children with undifferentiated fever, despite a low prevalence of bacterial illness.
The researchers examined clinical presentation and management of Kenyan children with fever at five hospitals or clinics from 2014 through 2017. The aim of the study was to characterize which variables are associated with higher odds of antibiotic therapy in both malaria-negative and malaria-positive children and to evaluate the concordance of diagnosis of bacterial illness with antibiotic treatment. All five sites were in malaria-endemic regions of Kenya, and all children in the study were tested for malaria by blood smear microscopy.
Of the 5,737 children enrolled in the study, 68% (3,902) were prescribed antibiotic therapy, while 14% (812) received a primary diagnosis of bacterial illness. In 777 children (14%), bacterial illness was given as the differential diagnosis. Nearly two thirds of those given antibiotics (64%) had neither a primary nor differential diagnosis of bacterial illness.
On multivariate analysis, a negative malaria test was associated with a sevenfold increase in the odds of receiving an antibiotic (odds ratio, 7.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.6 to 9.1). Other factors associated with increased odds of antibiotic therapy included age 1 to 4 years; reporting of head, ears, eyes, nose, and throat symptoms; and having a flush toilet in the home.
"Based on these results and given the degree of diagnostic uncertainty, providers seem highly reluctant to discharge febrile children without empiric antibiotic treatment," the authors of the study wrote.
They suggested that providers in these settings, lacking point-of-care tests beyond those for malaria, may benefit from improved clinical education and implementation of enhanced guidelines for clinical decision-making.
Sep 3 Clin Infect Dis abstract
Stewardship intervention tied to significantly less carbapenem use
Originally published by CIDRAP News Sep 1
A policy involving mandatory infectious disease (ID) consultation and post-prescription review with feedback (PPRF) was tied to in sustained reduction in the use of carbapenem antibiotics at two hospitals in Washington state, researchers reported yesterday in Clinical Infectious Diseases.
In a retrospective study conducted at the University of Washington Medical Center (UWMC) and Harborview Medical Center (HMC), researchers evaluated the impact of the policy on antibiotic consumption and clinical outcomes over a 6-year period, comparing the pre-intervention period with the post-intervention period. The policy, which was prompted by a critical shortage of meropenem in November 2015, required mandatory ID consultation and PPRF for all meropenem and imipenem use beyond 72 hours.
The primary outcome of the study was meropenem and imipenem days of therapy (DOT) per 1,000 patient-days. Secondary outcomes included meropenem and imipenem initiation and 30-day mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS).
There were 4,066 and 2,552 patients in the pre- and post-intervention periods, respectively. During the pre-intervention period, meropenem and imipenem DOT/1,000 patient-days remained stable, then dropped sharply after introduction of the intervention, falling by 72.1% (95% CI, 66.9% to 76.6%; P < 0.001) at UWMC and by 43.6% (95% CI, 20.7% to 59.9%; P = 0.001) at HMC, with a sustained effect over 4 years. In addition, although the intervention did not address use until 72 hours after initiation, there was a significant decline in meropenem and imipenem initiation in the post-intervention period, with a 64.9% reduction (95% CI, 58.7% to 70.2%; P < 0.001) at UWMC and a 44.7% reduction (95% CI, 28.1% to 57.4%; P < 0.001) at HMC.
No significant differences were found between the pre- and post-intervention periods in 30-day mortality or hospital LOS.
"Our study shows that PPRF combined with a potential mandatory ID consultation can serve as an impactful yet relatively low-resource intervention that can significantly reduce carbapenem consumption without compromising clinical outcomes," the authors of the study wrote.
Aug 31 Clin Infect Dis abstract
Paper highlights promise of bacteriophage therapy
Originally published by CIDRAP News Aug 31
A new paper in Open Forum Infectious Diseases lays out some of the lessons learned from cases of antibiotic-resistant infections treated with bacteriophage therapy.
For the paper, researchers with the Center for Innovative Phage Applications and Therapeutics (IPATH) at the University of California, San Diego, reviewed nearly 2 years of consult requests for bacteriophage therapy and examined outcomes from the first 10 cases at the center treated with intravenous (IV) bacteriophage therapy. IPATH was launched in 2018 to expand clinical use of the bacteria-killing viruses against multidrug-resistant infections.
Of the 785 requests from patients and physicians, 82% were for treatment of bacterial infections, primarily those caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Staphylococcus aureus, and Mycobacterium abscessus. Bacteriophage therapy was administered to 17 of 119 patients in whom it was recommended, and the median time from request to administration was 170 days.
Review of the first 10 cases, seven of which had successful outcomes, showed that administration of IV and nebulized bacteriophage therapy appears safe, may be safely administered by outpatients, and can be used to suppress infections. The review also found that bacterial resistance to bacteriophage therapy can develop but can be overcome with new phages, that combining phages and antibiotics can lead to successful outcomes despite the presence of in vitro antibiotic resistance, and that treatment failure can occur despite in vitro phage susceptibility.
"In conclusion, our experience with BT [bacteriophage therapy] for a variety of indications highlights the promise of BT for multiple clinical indications," the authors of the paper wrote. "Significant work is needed to identify predictors of success and for design of clinical trials that will lead to more widespread use."
Aug 27 Open Forum Infect Dis abstract
European drug makers call for new reimbursement models for antibiotics
Originally published by CIDRAP News Aug 31
The BEAM (Biotech companies in Europe combating Antimicrobial Resistance) Alliance late last week urged the European Union (EU) and individual member states to adopt new reimbursement models for antibiotics.
In a paper on its website, the alliance, which includes 70 small- and medium-sized European companies involved in antibiotic development, called on the European Commission to create a new pull incentive framework that would help make new antibiotics more commercially viable and to provide guidance to member states on the size of the incentives that would be required.
The group also encouraged member states to champion and adopt a new EU legislative framework that would encourage the development of new antibiotics and to create new reimbursement models similar to those adopted in the United Kingdom and Sweden.
"Because new antibiotics are (appropriately) held in reserve, developers of new medicines have struggled financially or have gone bankrupt," the alliance said. "The BEAM Alliance and the co-signatories of this paper urge the EU and its member states to urgently act and fix the broken economics around investment into the development and commercialization of antimicrobials."
In another paper posted on its website last week, the alliance applauded the launch of the AMR Action Fund, a nearly $1 billion effort by pharmaceutical companies to support late-stage antibiotic development announced earlier this summer. But the group noted that the fund "must be matched by a commercial ecosystem that is supportive of innovation in the field, so that the antibacterial drugs developed as a result of this funding can be truly viable from a market as well as scientific and clinical perspective."
Aug 28 BEAM Alliance paper on new reimbursement models
Aug 27 BEAM Alliance reflection paper on the AMR Action Fund