A new survey of US adults suggests that, despite the spread of conspiracy theories about vaccines in recent years, most Americans trust the work of vaccine scientists.
The survey from the Annenberg Public Policy Center (APPC) found that, among 1,650 adults polled in February, nearly seven in 10 (69%) say they trust vaccine scientists a "moderate amount" or more to act in their best interest. The amount of trust in vaccine scientists was statistically the same as it was for medical scientists (72%) and scientists in general (70%).
The survey's margin of error was plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.
The findings come amid growing challenges to vaccine science that flourished during the COVID-19 pandemic and have been elevated by Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr., who has promoted the debunked idea that vaccines are linked to autism and once called the COVID-19 shot "the deadliest vaccine ever made."
“It is reassuring to see that the public trusts vaccine scientists to act in their best interests just as much as scientists in general, despite the unfounded attacks on vaccine research,” APPC research analyst Laura Gibson said in an Annenberg news release.
By comparison, the survey found similar rates of trust in police officers (70%) and the military (70%). But trust in vaccine scientists, and scientists in general, was much higher than for religious leaders (47%), journalists (49%), elected officials (36%), and business leaders (30%).
Most believe vaccine science has been beneficial
When asked whether the findings produced by vaccine scientists over the past decade have benefited the country as a whole, 61% said they "strongly" or "somewhat" agree, while 61% said they strongly or somewhat agree the findings have benefited "people like me." The responses were similar for scientists in general (61% and 64%, respectively).
The survey also shows Americans believe vaccine scientists are just as beneficial, credible, self-correcting, and unbiased as scientists in general. But vaccine scientists were seen as less prudent than scientists in general.