Meta-analysis suggests fidaxomicin is most effective C diff treatment
A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials examining antibiotic therapy for non-recurrent Clostridium difficile infections has found that fidaxomicin provides a sustained symptomatic cure most frequently, researchers reported yesterday in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.
For the network meta-analysis, researchers from the University of Leeds screened more than 23,000 studies published through June 2017 to compare and rank the efficacy of 13 different treatments for non-recurrent C difficile infections. The primary outcome was sustained symptomatic cure, defined as the number of patients with resolution of diarrhea minus the number with recurrence or death.
The final analysis included 24 randomized controlled trials, which comprised 5,361 patients. The overall quality of evidence was rated as moderate to low. For sustained symptomatic cure, fidaxomicin (odds ratio [OR], 0.67) and teicoplanin (OR, 0.37) were significantly better than vancomycin, while teicoplanin (OR, 0.27), ridinilazole (OR, 0.41), fidaxomicin (OR, 0.49), surotomycin (OR, 0.66), and vancomycin (OR, 0.73) were better than metronidazole. Bacitracin was inferior to teicoplanin (OR, 0.22) and fidaxomicin (OR, 0.40), and tolevamer was inferior to all drugs except for LFF571 (OR, 0.50) and bacitracin (OR, 0.67). Global heterogeneity of the entire network was low.
"The findings of this network meta-analysis suggest that, of the currently approved treatments, fidaxomicin has the strongest evidence for being the most effective treatment in providing a long-term cure against C difficile," the authors write. "Apart from affordability, there is little evidence to support use of metronidazole as a first-line treatment against infections with C difficile."
They add that teicoplanin and ridinilazole could also be effective treatments, but that routine implementation of these drugs should await results from large trials.
Jul 16 Lancet Infect Dis study
Antifungal stewardship reduces antifungal costs, study finds
Introduction of an antifungal stewardship team to a tertiary cardiopulmonary hospital significantly reduced monthly antifungal expenditures, UK researchers reported yesterday in Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.
The stewardship team, consisting of a medical mycologist and a specialist pharmacist, provided weekly stewardship ward rounds, twice monthly multidisciplinary team meetings, and a dedicated weekly outpatient clinic. Data for the first 18 months of fungal stewardship implementation was recorded.
A total of 178 patients were reviewed by the stewardship team over the 18-month period, with 285 recommendations made to inpatients and 287 recommendations made to outpatients. The most common diagnoses treated were allergic bronchopulmonary asperilligosis and chronic pulmonary asperilligosis. Cystic fibrosis patients were the largest patient group. Among the recommendations of the stewardship team were stepping down treatment to oral antifungals, ensuring appropriate dosing to attain therapeutic levels and avoid toxicity, and stopping treatment in patients without confirmed fungal disease or those likely to only be colonized.
The intervention was associated with an overall reduction in antifungal expenditure of 44.8%, from £290,000 ($380,000) per month to £160,000 ($209,000) per month, largely driven by reduced use of intravenous voriconazole and caspofungin. In addition, there was a reduction in defined daily dose per 100 bed-days of all antifungal medications (P = 0.017). There was no increase in morbidity or mortality.
The authors of the study conclude that with the use of antifungals in patients with chronic respiratory disease likely to continue rising due to better recognition of fungal disease, this stewardship model could be introduced in other facilities where antifungal expenditures are climbing.
Jul 16 Antimicrob Agents Chemother abstract
Spero awarded $16 million to develop treatment for drug-resistant UTI
The Biomedical Advanced Research and Development Authority (BARDA) awarded Spero Therapeutics, Inc, a biopharmaceutical company in Cambridge, Mass., up to $54 million to develop SPR994, Spero's oral carbapenem product candidate.
SP994 would be used to treat complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by antibiotic resistant gram-negative bacteria. The award includes an initial $15.7 million, with the potential for an additional $28.5 million to be given over 5 years.
"As part of the inter-agency collaboration with Spero, a series of studies to assess the efficacy of SPR994 in the treatment of infections caused by biodefense threats such as anthrax, plague and melioidosis will be conducted by the U.S. Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases (USAMRIID). In addition, the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) will provide support up to $10 million to fund the nonclinical biodefense aspects of the inter-agency collaboration," Spero said in a press release.
Spero said it plans to initiate a phase 3 clinical trial of SPR994 for the treatment of cUTI at the end of this year. In preclinical studies, SPR994 showed potent antibiotic activity against gram-negative bacteria, including extended-spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBLs) and ESBL-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.
Jul 16 Spero press release