A group of public health organizations, lawyers, and scholars, has filed an amicus brief in the US District Court of Massachusetts supporting plaintiffs American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and others against defendant Robert F. Kennedy Jr., secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), and warning that recent federal actions weakening routine childhood vaccination recommendations pose an urgent threat both for children and the public’s health.
The AAP alleges in a lawsuit filed last year that recent changes to the routine childhood vaccine recommendation schedule in the United States violates the Administrative Procedure Act.
Defendants’ actions will depress vaccination rates and cause increased vaccine-preventable outbreaks, preventable hospitalizations, and unnecessary deaths.
“Defendants made these disruptive changes without considering the overwhelming science or following ACIP’s longstanding procedural safeguards,” the brief states, referring to the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. “Defendants’ actions will depress vaccination rates and cause increased vaccine-preventable outbreaks, preventable hospitalizations, and unnecessary deaths. Medically underserved communities and the safety-net providers who serve them will disproportionately suffer the consequences.”
Shared decision-making refuted
The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the American Thoracic Society, the Network for Public Health Law, and 119 deans and professors are among those listed in the brief.
In the brief, the safety and efficacy of childhood vaccine are emphasized, while the “shared clinical-decision making” (SCDM) model touted by HHS is described as a way to further sow distrust in safe vaccines.
“Placing a vaccine on the routine schedule does not create a mandate, but the routine schedule ensures that immunizations will be part of the preventive standard of practice for children and the default approach. SCDM has the opposite effect,” the brief states.