Our weekly wrap-up of antimicrobial stewardship & antimicrobial resistance scans
Report shows steep declines in antibiotic use on British poultry farms
A report this week from the British Poultry Council (BPC) shows steep reductions in antibiotic use in recent years.
According to the BPC's 2020 Antibiotic Stewardship Report, total antibiotic use on farms raising chickens, ducks, and turkeys fell by 76% from 2012 through 2019, and the use of critically important antibiotics—those also used in human medicine—declined by 97.3%. In 2019, the sector used 19.7 tons of antibiotics, which accounts for 9.3% of the total antibiotics licensed for use in food-producing animals in the United Kingdom.
The report noted that while 2019 saw a slight increase in antibiotic use due to disease challenges, the sector remains below industry-specified targets.
"The British poultry meat sector stands committed to upholding the UK’s position at the forefront of international efforts to keep antibiotics effective for future generations and tackling antimicrobial resistance," BPC Chief Executive Richard Griffiths said in a press release. "UK poultry meat producers have stopped all preventative treatments and the highest priority antibiotics that are critically important for humans are used only as a 'last resort' for chickens and turkeys."
Sep 8 BPC 2020 Antibiotic Stewardship Report
Sep 8 BPC press release
FDA grants orphan drug status for antibiotic peptide
Biotechnology platform company Peptilogics, of Pittsburgh, announced this week that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has granted Orphan Drug Designation for PLG0206, an antibiotic peptide, for the treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJIs).
PLG0206 is a broad-spectrum cationic antibiotic peptide with a novel mechanism of action that kills bacterial cells by targeting and disrupting the bacterial membrane. It has demonstrated activity against pathogens identified as critical, urgent, or high-priority targets by the World Health Organization and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and addresses the biofilms and persistent pathogens that make PJIs difficult to treat.
Under the Orphan Drug Act, the FDA can grant Orphan Drug Designation to a drug or biological product that treats a rare disease or condition that affects fewer than 200,000 people in the United States, provided the drug and the disease or condition meet certain criteria. Orphan designation qualifies the sponsor of the drug for certain incentives, including a partial tax credit for clinical trial expenditure, waived user fees, and eligibility for 7 years of marketing exclusivity.
"PLG0206 is the first novel anti-infective to be granted Orphan Drug Designation, confirmation that we are advancing a meaningful therapy that can address an unmet medical need, beginning with PJI," Peptilogics Founder and CEO Jonathan Steckbeck, PhD, said in a press release.
Sep 9 Peptilogics press release
IDSA releases new treatment guidance for drug-resistant pathogens
Originally published by CIDRAP News Sep 9
The Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) yesterday released new guidelines for the treatment of three common antibiotic-resistant pathogens.
The goal of the guidelines, the first in a series of narrowly focused guidance documents that IDSA will be publishing on multiple platforms, are to assist clinicians in selecting antibiotic therapy for extended-spectrum beta-lactamase–producing Enterobacterales (ESBL-E), carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa with difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR-P aeruginosa). The three pathogens have been designated as serious or urgent threats by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, cause a wide variety of infections, and have limited treatment options.
Created as an alternative to comprehensive clinical practice guidelines, which can take years to produce and publish, the guidance was developed by a panel of six infectious diseases specialists with expertise in antibiotic-resistant bacterial infections to address specific clinical questions about difficult-to-manage infections that are not covered by current guidelines, and is based on a review of the literature.
"Clinicians rely on evidence-based guidelines from other clinicians who have considered the literature and available data," panel co-chair Cornelius J. Clancy, MD, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System's chief of infectious diseases and an associate professor of medicine and director of the XDR Pathogen Lab at the University of Pittsburgh, said in an IDSA press release. "This guidance provides clinicians with real-word recommendations on how to deal with real-world problems."
The guidance will be updated as new data emerge, and future iterations will address other resistant pathogens.
Sep 8 IDSA guidance
Sep 8 IDSA press release
Study: Discordant antibiotics fairly common for bloodstream infections
Originally published by CIDRAP News Sep 9
A study led by researchers with the National Institutes of Health found that nearly one in five patients with bloodstream infections in US hospitals received discordant antibiotic therapy, which was associated with antibiotic-resistant pathogens and increased mortality. The results appeared yesterday in The Lancet Infectious Diseases.
The retrospective cohort analysis of electronic health record (EHR) data from 131 US hospitals looked at all patients with suspected and subsequently confirmed bloodstream infections who were treated empirically with antibiotics from 2005 through 2014.
The researchers defined empiric antibiotic therapy as discordant if the bloodstream isolate from a patient did not display in-vitro susceptibility to any systemic antibiotic administered in the day of blood culture sampling. Using the EHR data, they estimated the prevalence of discordant antibiotic therapy, identified predictors of receiving discordant therapy, and calculated the adjusted odds ratio for the relationship between discordant therapy and in-hospital mortality.
Of the 21,608 patients who received empiric antibiotics on the first day of blood culture collection, 4,165 (19%) received discordant empiric antibiotic therapy based on retroactive assessment of final susceptibility results. Of those patients, 1,958 (49%) had antibiotic-resistant bloodstream isolates. Most patients who received discordant therapy had infections caused by resistant Enterobacterales or Staphylococcus aureus. Patients infected with antibiotic-resistant pathogens were nine times more likely to receive discordant empiric therapy than those with susceptible infections (adjusted odds ratio, 9.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 7.68 to 10.76).
Discordant empiric therapy was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.28 to 1.66), which was unaffected by the presence or absence of resistance, sepsis, or septic shock.
The study also found that discordant empiric therapy was not significantly affected by hospital-level characteristics, a finding the authors say suggests that the problem is widespread, and that any efforts to optimize empiric prescribing would need to be implemented on a large scale.
"Such optimisation is likely to improve survival in all bacteraemic patients," they wrote. "Early identification of bloodstream pathogens, especially Enterobacterales and S aureus, and associated resistance profiles could improve outcomes in patients with bloodstream infections on a population level."
Sep 8 Lancet Infect Dis abstract