UK study details high inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in primary care
An analysis of the electronic health records of more than 1.6 million UK patients revealed that doctors don't always prescribe antibiotics according to guidelines, especially for upper respiratory tract infections (URTI) and otitis externa (outer ear passage infection), according to a study yesterday in the Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.
The main goal of the study was to look at how antibiotic prescribing deviated from national guidelines released in 2017. The research group focused on prescriptions after 2010 when Public Health England published its first guidelines for managing infections in primary care. The data they used cover about 8% of the UK population and were collected from January 2010 through June 2015.
The investigators found that the highest levels of prescribing not in accord with guidelines were for otitis externa (67.3%) and URTI (38.7%). Levels were relatively low for otitis media (3.4%), sinusitis (2.2%), lower respiratory tractions infections (LRTI) (1.5%), and urinary tract infection (UTI) in adults (2.3%), and UTI in children (0.7%).
Though not recommended for the conditions, amoxicillin was the most common drug prescribed for all respiratory tract infections except for URTI. Small variations in inappropriate prescribing was linked to the clustering effect at the practice level, and the group also found that patients with underlying health conditions were more likely to receive inappropriate antibiotics for URTI, LRTI, and UTI in adults.
The researchers concluded that future studies should examine how individuals' characteristics vary between practices and that future antibiotic stewardship activities should focus on urging primary care providers to cut back on amoxicillin use in favor of narrow-spectrum antibiotics.
Aug 20 J Antimicrob Chemother abstract
Combination drug for complicated UTIs shows promise in phase 3 trial
The results of a randomized non-inferiority trial conducted in India suggest a novel combination of two antibiotics and an antibiotic adjuvant could be a potential alternative to carbapenems for patients who have complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by multidrug-resistant gram-negative pathogens.
In the phase 3 trial, published today in Open Forum Infectious Diseases, 230 adults at 17 sites with a diagnosis of cUTI, including acute pyelonephritis, were randomized 1:1 to receive either intravenous ceftriaxone, sulbactam, and disbodium EDTA (CSE) or intravenous meropenem. The addition sulbactam and disbodium EDTA (a known metal chelator) has been shown to expand the in vitro activity of ceftriaxone against beta-lactamase producing bacteria, and CSE has demonstrated efficacy in animal infection models. The primary objective of the trial was to show the noninferiority of CSE to meropenem in the microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) population at the test-of-cure visit, with a non-inferiority margin of 10 percentage points.
The mMITT population consisted of 143 patients, with 74 receiving CSE and 69 receiving meropenem. Ceftriaxone non-susceptible pathogens were identified in 140 patients (97.9%), extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing pathogens in 119 (83.2%), and multidrug-resistant pathogens in 100 (69.9%).
Noninferiority of CRE to meropenem was demonstrated for both of the US Food and Drug Administration–defined co-primary end points. Seventy-one of 74 patients (95.9%) in the CSE group showed symptomatic resolution at test-of-cure, compared with 62 of 69 patients (89.9%) in the meropenem group (treatment difference, 6 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], -2.6 to 16), and 70 of 74 patients (94.6%) in the CSE group showed both symptomatic resolution and microbiologic eradication at test-of-cure, compared with 60 of 69 (87.0%) patients (treatment difference, 7.6 percentage points; 95% CI, -2 to 18.4). Non-inferiority was also demonstrated for the European Medicine Agency primary end point (microbiologic eradication at test-of-cure). The safety profile of CSE was consistent with that of ceftriaxone alone.
"The results support the use of CSE as a potential alternative to carbapenems in the treatment of patients with cUTI or acute pyelonephritis, including infections caused by extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing gram-negative bacteria," the authors of the study conclude.
The study was supported by CSE developer Venus Remedies Limited, and three of the six authors are employees of the company.
Aug 21 Open Forum Infect Dis abstract