Study finds uncomplicated UTI antibiotics are frequently inappropriate
A study of electronic health record (EHR) data from a US hospital network found that more than a third of antibiotic prescriptions for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (uUTIs) were inappropriate or suboptimal, researchers reported late last week in Antimicrobial Resistance and Infection Control.
Using EHR data from a large integrated delivery network in Mid-Atlantic states, researchers analyzed female patients ages 12 and over who had been diagnosed as having a uUTI, received one or more antibiotics, and had one or more urine cultures with an antibiotic susceptibility test from July 2016 through March 2020. The goals of the study were to examine the proportion of antibiotics that were inappropriate (not recommended according to Infectious Diseases Society of America guidelines) or suboptimal (switched within 28 days because of treatment failure) and the total healthcare costs 6 months after infection.
Among the 2,565 women with a uUTI included in the study, the most commonly prescribed antibiotics were nitrofurantoin (61%), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (19%), and ciprofloxacin (15%). More than one third of patients (40.2%) had an isolate that was not susceptible to one or more antibiotic indicated for treating uUTI patients. In total, 66.6% of patients received appropriate antibiotic therapy, while 29.9% received inappropriate treatment and 11.9% received suboptimal treatment. Inappropriate prescribing was more common for patients with non-susceptible (48.2%) versus susceptible (23.5%) isolates.
Patients who received inappropriate or suboptimal antibiotics had greater all-cause and UTI-related costs compared with appropriately prescribed patients, with the greatest difference seen among patients with antibiotic non-susceptible isolates.
The study authors note that while the results should not be extrapolated to a regional level, the findings are in line with previous studies that have found high rates of inappropriate prescribing for uUTIs and higher treatment costs linked to antibiotic resistance.
"As the incidence of antibiotic resistance has significantly increased in the US among community-acquired uUTIs, it is critical to understand regional resistance rates through local community surveillance to inform and improve empiric prescribing," the study authors wrote. "More rapid diagnostic tests are needed in order to optimize prescribing accuracy and avoid manifestation of painful symptoms."
Nov 4 Antimicrob Resist Infect Control study
Survey gauges interest in milk with responsible antibiotic use label
A survey and follow-up experiment conducted by researchers at Cornell University's College of Veterinary Medicine found that consumers will buy milk with a label indicating responsible antibiotic use, but they won't pay significantly more for it than conventionally raised milk. The results of the survey were published last week in the Journal of Dairy Science.
In the telephone survey, conducted among a nationally representative, random sample of 1,000 adults, respondents were asked about their awareness of antibiotic resistance-related issues and whether they would be willing to buy responsible antibiotic use (RAU)-labeled milk. That designation, which would allow for antibiotics to be used in dairy cattle only for therapeutic purposes, does not currently exist, but it has been proposed as an alternative to organic milk. Organic dairy farmers can use antibiotics to treat their cattle with antibiotics if needed, but cannot then market their milk as organic, which has led to some concerns about animal welfare.
In the survey, 75.1% of respondents said they were aware of antibiotic resistance-related issues and 48.5% said they would buy RAU-labeled milk, while 8.4% said they would continue to buy organic milk and 22.3% said they would continue to buy conventionally raised milk. Respondents who said they would prefer RAU-labeled milk over conventional described themselves as younger, aware of issues with antibiotic use, politically moderate, and having higher education.
But in an experimental auction conducted at Cornell, a sample of 85 residents of Ithaca, New York, after receiving information on what the different labels entailed, were unwilling to pay a significant premium for the RAU-labeled milk compared with unlabeled milk, while the premium for organic milk remained (mean willingness to pay per half-gallon: $2.24 for organic milk vs $1.92 for RAU-labeled milk vs $1.86 for unlabeled milk).
"This result suggests that despite consumers' aversion to antibiotic use in milk production, a market could exist for simply reducing their administration in exchange for a price premium lower than for organic milk," the study authors wrote.
Nov 1 J Dairy Sci study