New WHO framework aims to tackle rising resistance to HIV, STI, and hepatitis treatments

News brief
Boxes of HIV medications
USAID / Wikimedia Commons

The World Health Organization (WHO) yesterday released a roadmap to address rising resistance to treatments for HIV, hepatitis B and C, and sexually transmitted infections (STIs).

Building on the WHO's Global Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance, the integrated drug resistance action framework proposes a unified global approach to prevent the emergence and spread of drug resistance and reduce its impact through a people-centered approach. The document outlines strategic priorities and concrete actions across five key domains: prevention and response; monitoring and surveillance; research and innovation; laboratory capacity; and governance.

Current treatments for HIV, STIs, and hepatitis B and C face varying degrees of resistance. Among HIV patients with unsuppressed viral load, resistance to dolutegravir-based antiretroviral therapy has been reported in some low- and middle-income countries, with resistance rates ranging from 5% to 20%. Resistance to first-line treatments for Neisseria gonorrhoeae—one of the four most common STIs globally—have substantially increased over the past decade, leaving some gonorrhea patients with limited treatment options. 

And while WHO-recommended treatments for hepatitis B and C remain highly effective, there are concerns about emerging resistance amid expanded treatment access.

Rising resistance could undo decades of progress

WHO officials say drug resistance could lead to rising rates of new infections and treatment failure, increase preventable morbidity and mortality, undo decades of progress in HIV, hepatitis, and STI control, and undermine global elimination goals.

“This framework is a call to action for countries, communities and partners to unite around a shared agenda,” Tereza Kasaeva, MD, PhD, director of WHO’s Department for HIV, Tuberculosis, Hepatitis and Sexually Transmitted Infections, said in a news release. “Together, we can preserve the effectiveness of life-saving antimicrobial drugs and accelerate progress toward ending these epidemics.”

Estimate: US city-level COVID indoor vaccine mandates had uneven, marginal effects

News brief
Vaccine mandate sandwich board
Paul McKinnon / iStock

An analysis published in Contemporary Economic Policy suggests that COVID-19 indoor vaccine mandates in major US cities didn't increase weekly vaccination rates or reduce infections and deaths in adults or children, despite their success in countries such as Canada and France.

The authors, led by a Clemson University researcher, estimated the effect of mandates in nine major US cities on first-dose COVID-19 vaccine uptake, cases, and deaths. The included cities—New York City, San Francisco, New Orleans, Seattle, Los Angeles, Philadelphia, Boston, Chicago, and Washington DC—issued indoor vaccine requirements in 2021 and 2022.

“Governments implemented a wide range of policies during the COVID-19 pandemic to encourage vaccination and reduce disease spread, including public information campaigns, monetary incentives, and various forms of vaccine mandates,” they wrote. “Among the most restrictive and controversial of these were indoor vaccine mandates, which required proof of vaccination to enter public indoor venues such as restaurants, bars, gyms, and theaters.”

City-level mandates easy to skirt

While vaccine mandates appeared to be effective in some cities, no consistent pattern of significant effects was identified. “Even when point estimates appear sizeable… the confidence intervals are wide and include both meaningful increases and decreases,” the authors wrote.

Our findings don’t suggest that mandates can’t work—only that their effectiveness depends on timing, context, and how easily people can sidestep local restrictions.

Elijah Neilson, PhD

They said that city-level mandates—unlike those at country and state levels, which are difficult to avoid—may have had limited effects because unvaccinated people can skirt restrictions by traveling to nearby jurisdictions.

“The contrast with international findings suggests localized mandates may be less effective in settings with high baseline coverage, mobility across jurisdictions, and vaccine hesitancy,” as in the United States, the researchers wrote.

In a Wiley news release, corresponding author Elijah Neilson, PhD, of Southern Utah University, said, “By the time most cities introduced indoor vaccine mandates, vaccination rates were already high, and many unvaccinated individuals were deeply hesitant or resistant, leaving limited room for further gains.”

“Our findings don’t suggest that mandates can’t work—only that their effectiveness depends on timing, context, and how easily people can sidestep local restrictions,” he added.

Ethiopia’s Marburg death toll rises to 5

News brief
marburg
James Joel/ Flickr cc

At least five people are dead in a Marburg virus outbreak with 10 confirmed cases in Ethiopia. The country reported its first Marburg outbreak last week.

According to media reports, there may be an additional three deaths not yet lab confirmed associated with this outbreak. Marburg, a filovirus, is related to Ebola but has no vaccine or treatment. Outbreaks often have high fatality rates, and the virus is typically transmitted to people from fruit bats. 

Late last week the World Health Organization (WHO) said the source of the outbreak has not yet been identified

“Ethiopia is facing concurrent emergencies and multiple disease outbreaks, including of cholera, measles, dengue, which results in stretched health capacity,” the WHO said

This week's top reads

Our underwriters

Grant support for ASP provided by

Unrestricted financial support provided by