Study: Antibiotics do not reduce hospitalization risk for cough
A study published in the British Journal of General Practice yesterday shows that prescribing antibiotics to children with coughs does not reduce the risk of subsequent hospitalization.
The study involved researchers from the Universities of Bristol, Southampton, Oxford, and Kings College London, and looked at data on adverse outcomes in 8,320 children (ages 3 months to 15 years) who presented to their general practitioner (GP) with acute cough and other respiratory infection symptoms.
Immediate antibiotics were prescribed to 2,313 (27.8%) and delayed antibiotics to 771 (9.3%). Only 65 children (0.8%) children were hospitalized, and 350 (4.2%) revisited their GP for worsening of symptoms. Of the 65 children hospitalized, 25 (38.5%) had been prescribed an antibiotic.
"Compared with no antibiotics, there was no clear evidence that antibiotics reduced hospitalisations," the authors wrote. The immediate antibiotic risk ratio (RR) was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 1.45); delayed RR was 0.70 (95% CI, 0.26 to 1.90; overall P = 0.44).
"These results provide reassurance that, when faced with a child and uncertain prognosis, delayed prescribing can be a safe and effective method to reduce the child's probability of reconsulting with deterioration and can act as part of safety-netting strategies for parents," the authors concluded.
Sep 10 Br J Gen Pract study
Clinical trial doesn't support piperacillin-tazobactam for resistant BSIs
The results of a randomized clinical trial published today in JAMA indicate that the combination therapy piperacillin-tazobactam should not be used as carbapenem-sparing therapy in patients with bloodstream infections caused by ceftriaxone-resistant Escherichia coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae.
The noninferiority trial, the results of which were reported in April at the European Congress of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Disease, included hospitalized patients with ceftriaxone-resistant E coli or K pneumoniae from 26 sites in nine countries. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive either 4.5 grams of piperacillin-tazobactam—a beta lactam/beta lactamase inhibitor combination—every 6 hours, or 1 gram of meropenem every 8 hours. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality at 30 days after randomization, with a 5% noninferiority margin.
A total of 378 participants completed the trial and were assessed for the primary outcome. Of the 187 patients randomized to piperacillin-tazobactam, 23 (12.3%) met the primary outcome of mortality at 30 days, compared with 7 of 191 (3.7%) patients randomized to meropenem. Results were consistent in an analysis of the per-protocol population, with 30-day mortality in the piperacillin-tazobactam patients significantly higher than those treated with meropenem (10.6% vs. 3.8%). In addition, serious adverse events occurred in 5 of 188 patients (2.7%) treated with piperacillin-tazobactam, compared with 3 of 191 patients (1.6%) in the meropenem group.
"Among patients with E coli or K pneumoniae bloodstream infections and ceftriaxone resistance definitive treatment with piperacillin-tazobactam compared with meropenem did not result in noninferior 30-day mortality," the authors concluded. "These findings do not support the use of piperacillin-tazobactam in this setting."
Sep 11 JAMA abstract
Apr 24 CIDRAP News story "Combo antibiotic found inferior for MDR bloodstream infections"
Data show non-inferiority for combo antibiotic for serious pneumonia
Merck today announced that its antibiotic Zerbaxa (ceftolozane combined with tazobactam) was shown non-inferior to meropenem for adult patients who had either ventilated hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP), the company said in a news release.
This prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase 3 study assessed the safety and efficacy of Zerbaxa compared with meropenem in 726 adults with either ventilated HABP or VABP requiring intravenous antibiotic therapy. In the study, Zerbaxa was administered in an investigational 3-gram dose (compared with 1 gram of meropenem), and both drugs were given intravenously every 8 hours for 8 to 14 days, or for 14 days for Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection. Meropenem is an approved broad-spectrum injectable antibiotic widely used to treat serious infections.
Zerbaxa met the pre-specified primary end points, demonstrating non-inferiority to meropenem in day 28 all-cause mortality and in clinical cure rate. Zerbaxa is currently indicated in US adults for treating complicated urinary tract infections caused by certain gram-negative bacteria and for complicated intra-abdominal infections caused by certain gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. Merck is based in Kenilworth, N.J.
Based on the study results, Merck plans to submit supplemental new drug applications to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for this new indication.
"HABP and VABP are serious and life-threatening hospital related pulmonary infections, especially in patients with severe underlying medical conditions," said Roy Baynes, MD, PhD, senior vice president with Merck.
Sep 11 Merck news release
Study shows little connection between C diff in food animals, humans
After observing a rise in Clostridioides difficile (formerly Clostridium difficile) infections in the central part of the state, Minnesota investigators discovered a 0% prevalence of C difficile in retail metal samples in the area and a 9% rate in animal fecal samples, but the isolates did not match human isolates well, demonstrating that neither meat nor food animals are an important source of infection in that area, according to a study yesterday in the Journal of Food Protection.
C difficile infection (CDI) can cause a serious, typically healthcare-associated infection. But community-associated CDI (CA-CDI) now accounts for about 50% of CDI cases in central Minnesota, the study authors write.
They said that, from November 2011 to July 2013, they cultured retail meat products and fecal samples from food-producing and companion animals in central Minnesota forthe pathogen using standard methods. They recovered no C difficile from 342 retail meat samples but 51 (9.1%) from 559 fecal samples from food-producing animals.
They then compared the 51 livestock isolates with 30 archived local veterinary C difficile isolates and 208 human CA-CDI case isolates from central Minnesota from 2012 from the Minnesota Department of Health. "Overall," the researchers write, "the 81 animal source isolates and 208 human source isolates were highly diverse genetically." Only 5 human isolates were classified as animal source.
"These data do not support meat products or food-producing and companion animals as important sources of CA-CDI in the central Minnesota study region," the authors conclude.
Sep 10 J Food Prot abstract