- A new report by the Treatment Action Group (TAG) warns that key ingredients in several vaccines of global health importance may face critical supply bottlenecks in the coming years. The report focuses on supply chain issues for QS-21 and MPL adjuvants, part of licensed vaccines against malaria, shingles, and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), and a promising candidate vaccine for tuberculosis called M72/AS01E. For both adjuvants, the supply chain is complicated and has a thin safety margin.
- The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has contacted four major retailers after they failed to meet statutory requirements to ensure their stores removed ByHeart infant formula after it was recalled owing to an ongoing outbreak of infant botulism, Food Safety News reports. At least 51 babies have been sickened after drinking ByHeart powder formula. ByHeart issued a wide recall in mid-November of formula products. During surveillance checks conducted this past month, however, the FDA found the product at Albertsons, Kroger, Target, and Walmart stores. “Through this effort, we found that recalled infant formula continued to be found on store shelves — for over three weeks in one case, in over 175 locations across 36 states,” the FDA reported.
- According to the latest update from the US Department of Agriculture’s Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), officials have confirmed another avian flu outbreak in LaGrange County, Indiana, at a major duck breeder. A commercial duck breeder with 14,300 birds was hit, as well as a poultry facility with 2,200 birds in Jessamine, Kentucky.
Quick takes: Possible vaccine bottlenecks, ByHeart formula warnings, more avian flu in Indiana
Paxlovid linked to fewer lost workdays, disability claims in employees at high-risk for severe COVID
Treatment with the antiviral combination nirmatrelvir–ritonavir (Paxlovid) was associated with fewer lost workdays and lower disability-related costs among US employees at high risk for severe COVID-19, according to a retrospective observational study in the Journal of Medical Economics.
Using insurance claims and workplace productivity data from large US employers, the researchers, led by scientists from Paxlovid maker Pfizer, compared productivity outcomes among high-risk employees diagnosed as having COVID who either received Paxlovid within five days of diagnosis or received no antiviral.
Analyses of absences among treated and untreated workers and those on short-term disability (STD) and long-term disability (LTD) included 1,909, 20,065, and 20,318 employees, respectively. The study included data from December 2021 through December 2022, a period dominated by Omicron variants.
After 1:1 matching on age, sex, comorbidities, timing of infection, and baseline health care use, employees who received Paxlovid had 5% fewer workday absences, 17% fewer STD days, and 27% fewer LTD days per patient per month than untreated employees.
Monthly absence-related costs per treated worker were $434 versus $468 in their untreated counterparts, and daily costs were $84 versus $108 in treated versus untreated STD workers and $4.39 versus $7.35 for treated and untreated LTD staff.
Health care costs 2 to 3 times higher for infected workers
COVID has remained a major driver of disability claims and lost productivity. The authors note that direct health care costs for those diagnosed as having COVID were two to three times higher than those of controls in the six months following infection.
They noted that the analysis was restricted to employees of large, self-insured firms and may not generalize to other workers or those with different insurance status.
“Although findings indicate modest cost savings at the patient level, these savings could be substantial at the employer level, especially for employers with substantial populations of employees with specific comorbid conditions such as diabetes, overweight and obesity,” the researchers concluded.
2 salad-linked Listeria outbreaks show need for routine surveillance
Two genetically unrelated US outbreaks of Listeria monocytogenes infections linked to packaged salads from two different firms caused 30 illnesses, 27 hospitalizations, and four deaths over eight years, according to a new report by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention researchers and collaborators published in Emerging Infectious Diseases recently.
Though the two outbreaks were genetically unrelated, they were investigated concurrently: Outbreak A was investigated three times with illnesses occurring over eight years, whereas illnesses in outbreak B occurred over five years.
Outbreak A was detected via PulseNet in 2019, initially with five cases identified in five states. The investigation ended within that year, but was reopened when other states had similar detections via PulseNet in 2020 and 2021.
Outbreak B began in 2021, when PulseNet identified a cluster of 10 clinical isolates related to water-sediment isolates collected in the Salinas Valley of California. That outbreak was tied to 10 cases in eight states (Illinois, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Virginia).
Outbreaks show potential risk of packaged salads
“In the outbreaks described, packaged salad exposure was easily identified, but narrowing the source to a single firm was difficult because leafy green processors are often associated with multiple brands and can have similar packaging,” the authors wrote.
Both outbreaks highlight the ongoing potential for L. monocytogenes infections as a result of consuming contaminated packaged salads
Routine surveillance and actions taken by the producers of the bagged salads saved lives, they noted.
“Both outbreaks highlight the ongoing potential for L. monocytogenes infections as a result of consuming contaminated packaged salads, especially for high-risk consumers,” the authors added.